06-28-2012 11:05 AM
06-28-2012 12:41 PM
What about corporations that had adquired hundreds, perhaps thousands, of devices and now will get no support, no software updates. What about the stability issues that remain on the tablet operating system (obviously more stable than before, but far from being perfect yet)? What about the software bugs and security holes?
If such corporations exist, and they demand the update, we may see it. I doubt Lenovo has an "official" answer now, but I wouldn't count on it, tbh.
In 2013 (when such update may show up, given the previous history) TPT will be so slow and outdated, not many would care anyway. Hopefully, the new Thinkpad tablet, running Windows 8, will be better.
Plus, the days of Android tablets priced higher than laptops are officially over, with $200 Nexus 7.
06-28-2012 01:10 PM
06-28-2012 01:36 PM
Yep, I have a print-screen bitmap image of this post:
Just in case he pulls it later on or it is slightly modified....
But I'm giving Lenovo the benefit of the doubt that what that staffer said was just as a result of frustration from all presumption we were giving in the earlier posts of that thread. We'll see if Lenovo issues anything official as a result of that comment.
Ron
06-28-2012 02:38 PM - edited 06-28-2012 02:40 PM
I'm confused how "no upgrade to Jellybean" equates to "lack of support" or "no more updates". It seems like you have made those conclusions on your own. Nothing I have posted has suggested that TPT is unsupported, or that there aren't going to be more updates to fix issues that customers report to us. If that is how you have interpreted something that I have written, then you have made a mistake.
06-28-2012 02:54 PM
IIRC, Lenovo skipped Android 3.2 and went from 3.1 to 4.0. Based on the time it took, it's quite possible that 5.0 or whatever will be out before we see another O/S upgrade from Lenovo, if any. So not seeing 4.1 on the TPT is more than likely IMO.
BTW, isn't 4.0 --> 4.1 considered a minor upgrade using standard versioning nomenclature? If so, why does Google have to give it some other dumba$$ sweet name and have everyone riled up as though on a kid's sugar high? Wasn't 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2 all HC?
06-28-2012 05:24 PM
06-28-2012 05:55 PM
4.1 to me at least looks like a significant upgrade, mostly due to project butter but also some interface tweaks.
I was just going by the major.minor.patch (or something similar) versioning convention. The whole thing reeks of "Apple style" marketing IMO.
06-28-2012 09:43 PM
06-29-2012 03:07 AM
someotherguy wrote:I'm confused how "no upgrade to Jellybean" equates to "lack of support" or "no more updates". It seems like you have made those conclusions on your own. Nothing I have posted has suggested that TPT is unsupported, or that there aren't going to be more updates to fix issues that customers report to us. If that is how you have interpreted something that I have written, then you have made a mistake.
So there will be an update to release 4.0.4? Are the stability and performance improvements on this release on Lenovo's support roadmap or not? I think that it is reasonable asking for, at least, fixes to ICS!
It is a shame that Google has given a different name to Android 4.1, a shame, really. From wikipedia:
On 27 June 2012 at Google I/O, Google announced the next Android version, 4.1 Jelly Bean. It is an incremental update with the main focus of improving the user interface, both in terms of functionality and performance, the latter involving "Project Butter" which uses touch anticipation, triple buffering, extended vsync timing and a fixed frame rate of 60fps to create a fluid and "buttery" smooth UI.
An incremental update does not sound like a new operating system version. It is a shame on Google that they have renamed it for marketing purposes, really. But, well, it is too late to fix this mistake.