in ThinkPad: L, R and SL series Laptops https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-L-R-and-SL-series-Laptops/SL-Review/m-p/33798 ThinkPad: L, R and SL series Laptops topics Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:09:34 +0000 tp05_en <![CDATA[ ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/33798 http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4499

 

 

]]>
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:09:34 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/33798 LukeD
<![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/33810 LukeD,

 

Thanks for kicking this board off ! :smileyvery-happy:

 

Here's another from Engadget on the SL400 model.

  ]]> Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:53:17 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/33810 Mark_Lenovo <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/33833 Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:50:49 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/33833 wjli2 <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34118 Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:35:06 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34118 JaneL <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34119


wjli2 wrote:
The only thing i wonder is whether SL is in the same thickness or weight class of T series.

 

Here you go:

 

Laptopmag video

 

Check out this video. I'm really concerned about where Lenovo is going with this new design. I instantly noticed a few things that I really do ]]> Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:36:23 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34200 gotGOLD <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34264 Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:32:57 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34264 732 <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34319 I totally agree with you, GotGold.

 

Just remember, this is Lenovo's entry-level consumer ThinkPad line.

 

 

]]>
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:34:08 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34319 LukeD
<![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34437 after careful review, it seems that SL lacks all the reinforcements that  T series have. Well i guess something has to give for that sort of price, so people should appreciate the high costs of all the roll cages that is built into every T series. But anyhow i am happy in expecting that next T ]]> Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:50:14 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34437 wjli2 <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34479 Hi, LukeD

 

I still think that the SL-series should have been launched as IdeaPad because it looks like one and is priced like one. ThinkPads aren't supposed to be entry-level consumer computers but rather high quality computers for people who can appreciate un-matchable quality an ]]> Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:01:08 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34479 gotGOLD <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34491 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:37:17 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34491 wjli2 <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34669 Those are true points regarding the SL series. I look forward to the new W and T series.

 

 

]]>
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:08:07 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/34669 LukeD
<![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35184 Hello everyone,

       In case you didn't read my introductory post, I am a product manager on the SL series. Has anyone had the opportunity to see and/or feel these machines in person? I think you will be pleasantly surprised by the robustness of the SL series. When we ]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:54:17 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35184 Brandon_Lenovo <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35208 i am wondering whether the SL laptop has the same magnesium chassis as the R series.

]]>
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:35:57 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35208 wjli2
<![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35213 Yes, please tell us if there is a magnesium chassis. Obviously, there is no internal roll cage. How is the SL just as durable as a T61P?

 

Can you stand on it, just as Lenovo sales representatives preach at corporate sales meetings?

 

I am very interested in this comput ]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:04:08 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35213 LukeD <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35215


wrote:

Hello everyone,

The SL series lives up to its ThinkPad branding by meeting the exacting standards of durability that we've set for it. If it means anything at all, I get to choose any ThinkPad I want as my work system, and I a ]]> Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:14:25 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35215 LukeD <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35417 Never mind, this answers all of my questions.

 

 

http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4512

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:02:39 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35417 LukeD <![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35969  
The only thing I did NOT like was the fact that it uses the Alps touchpad and not the Synaptics touchpad as historically all ThinkPads use.
 
I see that the SL sports most of the same design queues and that the touchpad look ]]>
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:54:29 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/35969 Kamika007z
<![CDATA[ Re: SL Review ]]> https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/686643 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:19:20 +0000 https://forums.lenovo.com/topic/findpost/1304/33798/686643 bananaman