Greetings spidey101!
Thank you for your reply.
Currently I cannot open the G50-30 notebook in order to inspect the number of slots.
Anyway an issue remains: how could that utility actually show a dual channel setup with a single module on this Levovo notebook? (actually 3 different testing software gave back the same status).
Theory says a single channel makes use of a 64-bit device width, which basically means that 64 bits of data are transferred at each transfer cycle. Thus, theoretically, bandwidth can be calculated as:
bandwidth = DDR clock rate x data bus width / 8
So, for a single channel DDR3-1333 Memory (as is this case), the theoretical bandwidth comes out to be
Bandwidth in Single Channel = 1333 x 64 / 8 = 10,664 MB/s or 10.6 GB/s
While a Bandwidth in Dual Channel = 1333 x (64 x 2) / 8 = 21,328 MB/s or 21.3 GB/s
Running a benchmark cache and memory test on this notebook the results are as follows (attached is a screenshot):
Memory Read 8389 MB/s
Write 7924 MB/s
Copy 7630 MB/s
These values are clearly coherent in the real world with a single channel configuration -- not dual. Therefore it appears the Lenovo Lancer 5A6 motherboard is performing a trick in order to give back a dual channel status while the performance - with that DDR3-1333 memory module - is single channel rated.
You affirmed that "Dual channeling is a technology that can be done by the ram even if there is only one physical memory stick.". Surely this test does not match the statement.
Could you please give us an example? Thank you.