Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Reply
Highlighted
802.11n
Posts: 240
Registered: ‎09-19-2011
Location: USA
Message 1 of 22 (1,795 Views)

SSD is the future? Not so fast...

[ Edited ]

The Bleak Future of NAND Flash Memory

 

I'm clinging to my huge capacity hard drives (3TB externals)  for now. I only cold boot once in a while, and to this end, I'm drawn to the hybrid SSD-hard drive approach.

 

" Conclusion
The technology trends we have described put SSDs in
an unusual position for a cutting-edge technology: SSDs
will continue to improve by some metrics (notably density
and cost per bit), but everything else about them
is poised to get worse. This makes the future of SSDs
cloudy: While the growing capacity of SSDs and high
IOP rates will make them attractive in many applications,
the reduction in performance that is necessary to increase
capacity while keeping costs in check may make it difficult
for SSDs to scale as a viable technology for some
applications. "

802.11n
Posts: 540
Registered: ‎11-04-2010
Location: Sydney
Message 2 of 22 (1,769 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

I'm currently still staying away from SSD for my work stuff.  The capacity is just not there.

 

Using a Scorpio Black 750GB and Caviar Black 2TB on the external.

HDMI
Posts: 142
Registered: ‎12-07-2010
Location: TORONTO
Message 3 of 22 (1,725 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

[ Edited ]

I am happier than a pig after having recieved my t 410s with it's preinstalled 128 GB drive; the speed of which leaves a disk in a ditch by comparison.

Do I care how a multi t-bite disk will perform in the next 5 years? I will deal with that in 5 years, and not worry about it now. The linked "study" should not defer anyone from an immediate purchase. Time spent waiting for data to load on a disk is money that is wasted, as well as being boring.

I love my LENOVO.
T 410s, WIN 7, 128 SSD, 64 Ult.


I do not work for LENOVO.
802.11n
Posts: 308
Registered: ‎03-30-2011
Location: CA
Message 4 of 22 (1,582 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

[ Edited ]

Why not use dual drives? I've got a 120GB SSD + 750 GB HDD, it's the best of both worlds, day to day use is noticably faster.  It's the biggest improvement I've ever had on a computer from upgrading a single piece of hardware (I had just a HDD originally).  If I could only use one though I'd have to use the HDD as I need the space, but dual drives was one of the reasons I got a W520.

802.11n
Posts: 240
Registered: ‎09-19-2011
Location: USA
Message 5 of 22 (1,571 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

[ Edited ]

Hi, Biz,

 

   Sure, making use of the mSATA slot for the SSD seems to make the most sense to me at this point, despite being SATA II. I'm already running dual HDD, because storage space is always the issue for me.I could go to a 1TB spinner + SSD in the main bay.

 

    With write caching turned on and disable buffer flush set, the spped of disk I/O becomes almost irrelevant, except at boot up time.

 

   Anyway, I am pretty satisfied for the moment without the SSD. Should Samsung actually deliver a 256GB mSATA as promised at a reasonable price, I'm likely to get onboard.

 

                                                                                     ZZ

Broadband 3G
Posts: 999
Registered: ‎01-06-2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Message 6 of 22 (1,551 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...


ZipZap wrote:

 

  With write caching turned on and disable buffer flush set, the spped of disk I/O becomes almost irrelevent, except at boot up time.

 

 

                                                                                     ZZ



Obviously you have never used an SSD.

802.11n
Posts: 540
Registered: ‎11-04-2010
Location: Sydney
Message 7 of 22 (1,533 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

LoL...

802.11n
Posts: 240
Registered: ‎09-19-2011
Location: USA
Message 8 of 22 (1,527 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

[ Edited ]

Hi, J,

 

No SSD yet, but I am looking forward to it.

 

I guess the concept of disk caching is foreign to you. Try googling it.

 

I do work with a lot of large image files. Have you compared the cost per GB?

 

Broadband 3G
Posts: 999
Registered: ‎01-06-2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Message 9 of 22 (1,517 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...


ZipZap wrote:

No, but I am looking forward to it.

 

I admit I am a programmer and mostly sit here staring at code and going... "duh". I don't need an SSD for that.

 



What IDE do you use? I guarantee it will load up much faster with an SSD. VS.net 2010 Ultimate loads in about 5 seconds for me. In fact the entire machine will be much more responsive.

802.11n
Posts: 240
Registered: ‎09-19-2011
Location: USA
Message 10 of 22 (1,513 Views)

Re: SSD is the future? Not so fast...

VS 2010.

 

No doubt an SSD will be a nice addition when they become cost effective.

Top Kudoed Authors