cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Reply
Grabtindy
Fanfold Paper
Posts: 10
Registered: ‎02-25-2010
Location: USA
Views: 1,151
Message 1 of 4

Poor 2d gfx performance on T510 i7-620m integrated graphics

Should I be concerned about the apparently low 2d vector graphic performance.  Seemed to be the lowest off all the benchmarks when I ran PassMark.  I have updated drivers, are there settings somewhere I should change?

 

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r264/grabtindy/gfxperf.png

 

Note from Moderator:  Image(s) >50k converted to link(s).

Retired Guru
Posts: 372
Registered: ‎02-12-2009
Location: US
Views: 1,097
Message 2 of 4

Re: Poor 2d gfx performance on T510 i7-620m integrated graphics

Integrated graphics aren't particulary quick, however it is possible that this will improve as drivers become more mature.  Do you have matched memory in your system or is it a mis-matched (odd number) amount of ram?

Thinkpad T500-2081 CTO | T9400 2.53GHz | 8 GB RAM | ATI HD3650 + Intel GM45 | 15.4" LED WXGA+ | Windows 10 | ATI Catalyst 13.1 (non-switchable)
Thinkpad 390x | PII 333 | 256mb ram | NeoMagic 256AV | SVGA LCD | OS/2 v4.52
Grabtindy
Fanfold Paper
Posts: 10
Registered: ‎02-25-2010
Location: USA
Views: 1,078
Message 3 of 4

Re: Poor 2d gfx performance on T510 i7-620m integrated graphics

I updated drivers when I first started the machine and I'm using matched (4gb) ram from the factory.  I know the integrated gfx aren't anything super special, but if memory serves my intel gma 450 mobo outperformed the Intel HD chipset on the same benchmark.

 

Other than that, i'm floored by this machine, its crazy fast.

TheDude
802.11n
Posts: 541
Registered: ‎09-10-2009
Location: USA
Views: 1,050
Message 4 of 4

Re: Poor 2d gfx performance on T510 i7-620m integrated graphics

2D takes almost no computations - a low value is not going to hold you back.

T61p, T400
formerly x23, x40

Check out current deals!


Shop current deals

Top Kudoed Authors