Support in other languages: 
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Welcome to the Lenovo Community

Welcome to the Forums!

Welcome to Lenovo's Peer-to-Peer Discussion Community!
Please note our guidelines. How to register and login and Community FAQs.
Shape the Future of PCs

Help Lenovo Shape the Future of PCs

Take the ownership survey. Share your ideas with our product team
Community Spotlight

Visit the Lenovo Blogs!

Check out the ThinkPad Time Machine
Visit the Community Spotlight Blog
Windows  10

Are you ready for Windows 10?

Get to know Windows 10
Visit the Windows 10 Support Center
Reply
Punch Card
Posts: 27
Registered: ‎05-08-2012
Location: California
0 Kudos
Accepted Solution

1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

This is a similar question to one that has been asked before, but I just want to make sure.

 

I'm about to pull the trigger on getting a Thinkpad W520, and was wondering on whether to get the system with an NVIDIA Quadro 1000M or the 2000M. The later is a $250 upgrade, has double the CUDA cores, uses 55W rather than 45W, and from what I heard is they are essentially the same chip, but the 2000M is 50% more powerful than the 1000M.

I've tried researching about these two but I'm still having trouble deciding. Is it worth the upgrade? Is the power consumption that much of a difference? (I don't know much about 45W vs 55W). Will it make my system run considerably hotter? I probably wouldn't tell the difference now, but I was thinking that the 2000M would be more future proof, since it is twice as powerful.

 

Thanks!

Punch Card
Posts: 15
Registered: ‎08-21-2011
Location: Canada
0 Kudos

Re: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

Thanks to the Optimus GPU switching you aren't going to see a difference in power consumption unless running a game or 3D app that will trigger the discreet graphics to be used. In that case you are probably going to be plugged into the wall anyways.

Being worth the money or not depends on what you are using it for. If you are going to be playing games on it and want to make full use of a 1080p screen it is probably worth upgrading rather than being unsatisfied with the performance and not being able to do anything about it. It could also be worth it if you work with 3D apps for visual effects, game development, etc.

No hardware is really future proof and you'll always be better off in the long run by getting a cheaper option that is good enough for what you need now and saving that money to buy another laptop later.

Punch Card
Posts: 63
Registered: ‎12-30-2011
Location: Miami
0 Kudos

Re: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

Seriously...it doesn't matter...

If you want to talk about future proof, put that 34mm ExpressCard slot to good use and get an external solution.

I hooked up a desktop GTX 670 to my W520 now.

Punch Card
Posts: 39
Registered: ‎12-13-2011
Location: USA
0 Kudos

Re: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

carage, Can you show how this gpu looks like? Thanks
W520 427637u
Highlighted
Punch Card
Posts: 27
Registered: ‎05-08-2012
Location: California
0 Kudos

Betreff: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery lif

I see, I guess I will be sticking with the 1000M. Thank you guys for your replies.

 

I was looking at the specs of the two, and for the 1000M it has 700 MHz of core clock, and 1400 MHz of shader clock, whilst the 2000M has 550 core and 1100 shader. Does anyone know what the means in terms of performance?

Guru
Posts: 8,986
Registered: ‎12-26-2009
Location: Vancouver
0 Kudos

Betreff: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery lif

Try these two comparisons:

2000M: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Quadro-2000M.47316.0.html
1000M: http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Quadro-1000M.47317.0.html

It looks like the 2000M is about 1.5x the performance of 1000M according to the 3DMark11 benchmark.
W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen & MB168B+
X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen
Serial Port
Posts: 112
Registered: ‎04-08-2012
Location: US/East Africa
0 Kudos

Betreff: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery lif

[ Edited ]

The 2000m has 192 CUDA cores which is great for applications that can take advantage of them (Adobe Premiere, After Effects, Maya, etc.) while the 1000m has 96.

 

The performance difference is really going to be up to you depending on what applications you use most.  If you do a lot of video editing, graphics work, etc. the 2000m might be a good fit.

Thinkpad W530: i7-3720QM, K1000M, FHD Screen, 16 GB PC12800, 240GB OCZ Vertex 3 SSD
Paper Tape
Posts: 6
Registered: ‎05-21-2012
Location: Montreal, QC

Re: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

If you are planning on using Adobe Creative Suite 6, you should know that the 2000M is officially supported for the Mercury Playback Engine, while the 1000M is not.

Punch Card
Posts: 63
Registered: ‎12-30-2011
Location: Miami
0 Kudos

Re: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

Token Ring
Posts: 273
Registered: ‎05-04-2012
Location: United Kingdom
0 Kudos

Re: 1000M vs 2000M. Does 10W in a GPU make a big difference in power consumtion and battery life?

[ Edited ]

Mercury support isn't all that important as in CS5 it was just a simple addition to the text file.
Anything Nvidia with over 768MB of RAM will work in Premiere.